He suggests that authoritarian structures, including doctrines and leadership, should be temporary and subject to constant reevaluation and evolution, with leaders elected by the community. Failure to do this can result in “institutional Idolatry.”
His ideal church would welcome questioners, and he uses Jesus’ frequent questions (like “Who do you say that I am?’) as a model, suggesting that even those in leadership positions should continue to be “humble learners,” open to the ongoing dialogue.
He challenges the need for clerical dress, citing its expense and its contemporary irrelevance.
Finally, he suggests that interfaith dialogue is the way forward, compelling us to challenge many of our beliefs including the “old anthropomorphisms” of a male-gender Divinity.
FCM embodies many (most) of these elements. But all of us can continue to grow.
Anthony S. Ercolano, D.Min.
aercolano@att.net
Reflection: https://flimkien.mt/ilhna-u-fehmiet/my-ideal-church-reflections-of-an-older-historical-theologian/